Tagged: batman

Final trailer for “The Dark Knight Rises”

Well, that was unexpected. The third and final trailer for “The Dark Knight Rises” has arrived online earlier than anticipated, giving us our best look yet at what appears to be the basic story of the film.

I say the basic story because we still don’t really know the full plot of the movie, which is quite something. We know that Bane (Tom Hardy) attacks Gotham City and Batman (Christian Bale). We know Batman is badly injured and maybe/probably taken out of the game for a while. We know Anne Hathaway plays Catwoman and we know Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays a Gotham police officer. This trailer gives us a much better glimpse of Hathaway and Gordon-Levitt, while also showing a bit more of what happens after Batman faces Bane. (I am oddly pleased this trailer seems to give us an idea of the basic story structure without giving away every major detail. I am also pleased that Christopher Nolan and whomever cut this trailer opted to shy away from the excessive BWAAAAM-ing that has taken over every post-”Inception” trailer.)

What else do we know? We know the city descends into chaos and Batman eventually flies his Chris Nolan-fied Batwing. We know Marion Cotillard is in there, and that is all one can say about that without spoiling anything. We know Gary Oldman, Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman are back. We don’t really know the overall stakes of the story, nor do we know the backstory behind some of the things we saw photographed on-set when the movie was filming. We also don’t know perhaps the biggest lingering issue: We don’t know if Nolan truly wraps up his series — i.e. kills Batman — and leaves the franchise to completely reboot in his wake. July 20 cannot come soon enough.

The trailer is appearing in front of “The Avengers” this weekend, and Warner Bros. began pushing out some so-called “viral” marketing campaign on Monday that revealed images from that trailer. (One enterprising fan even turned these released images into a GIF.) It was expected that the actual trailer wouldn’t appear online until sometime after “The Avengers” came out. The second trailer, last December, hit theaters over the weekend and didn’t officially arrive online until after the weekend was over; as a result, many people watched crappy bootlegged versions that people had recorded in theaters. I’m guessing Warner Bros. wanted to avoid a repeat of that. And if this trailer makes “The Avengers” an afterthought, however briefly, in the week leading up to its release…well, I’m sure Warner Bros. doesn’t mind that.

Share

New trailer for “The Dark Knight Rises”

Well doesn’t this just look awful! The second trailer for “The Dark Knight Rises” has arrived, and it just looks terrible, like the entire movie will be this boring thing filled with bad actors and poor special effects and in no way will it melt all of our faces clean off.

Okay, so I guess it looks like it could be a little bit decent. The first teaser trailer that dropped over the summer didn’t reveal much of anything (because filming was still ongoing) (and, also, because it was a teaser trailer), but this longer look actually shows us the main players, gives us an idea of the film’s themes and conveys the film’s tone and mood.

So what do we know? We know Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman (even if she isn’t referred to as Catwoman in any of the promotional materials) delivers a very Occupy Wall Street-esque line to Christian Bale’s hobbled, older Bruce Wayne. “When it hits, you’re all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us,” she purrs. (Purrs? Purrs.) We know Hines Ward can outrun a supervillain’s dastardly plan. (I believe you get extra fantasy points for outrunning a field-leveling earthquake, or whatever that is.) We know Marion Cotillard, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Matthew Modine are in the movie, however briefly. We know there’s a Batwing.

We know it’s not July 20, 2012. We do not know how in the hell we’re going to wait another seven months for this movie.*

[Apple]

* – We don’t know when we’re going to stop saying “we” for everything, either.

Share

Warner Bros. is eyeballing a “Batman” reboot and a “Justice League” movie

Ben Fritz profiled Jeff Robinov in today’s L.A. Times. Robinov is about to succeed Alan Horn as the top film exec at Warner Bros., and is one of the main candidates to replace studio chairman Barry Meyer after his contract is up in 2013. So it’s worth taking a look at the man who would run Warner Bros., the studio that finished among the top two studios in market share seven times between 2001 and 2010. And he has some big plans for the company’s comic book properties.

“The Dark Knight Rises” and the new “Superman” are both due out next year. Looking beyond that, Robinov is talking up a “Justice League” film in 2013 as well as a rebooted “Batman” in the post-Nolan era. Yes, the new “Batman” hasn’t even started filming, and he’s already plotting for a reboot with Nolan and Emma Thomas producing. The “Batman” thing is unsurprising — at this point in time, the two biggest comic book movie properties are “Batman” and “Spider-Man” (no, “X-Men” and “Superman” don’t make the top two) — but the “Justice League” tidbit was unexpected. After all, a “Justice League” movie (directed by George Miller and starring Adam Brody and Armie Hammer, among others) was thisclose to production before the writer’s strike of 2007 and 2008.

Robinov is clearly watching Marvel (and their new parent company, Disney) rev up for “The Avengers,” and has decided to take the same road but in the opposite direction. Whereas Marvel is rolling out solo flicks for Captain America and Thor before they join Iron Man on-screen next year, Robinov wants to put everybody together in a “Justice League” movie and give The Flash and Wonder Woman solo adventures afterwards. (This doesn’t include “Green Lantern,” already heading for theaters this summer, but that film is mentioned as one of their big comic book properties.)

This guy has an intriguing history. He likes big-budget “tentpoles,” as you can tell from the comic book movie thing. He closed the specialty movie division in 2008 and infamously passed on “Slumdog Millionaire.” According to the story, people say “Robinov’s greatest strength is his willingness to take creative risks on ambitious movies — a rarity in a business that increasingly plays it safe.” This is defined as hiring Chrisopher Nolan, Guy Ritchie and Zack Snyder to direct major properties, and I guess those are creative risks. Nolan’s “Batman” movies were stripped-down, realistic affairs about vigilantism and terrorism; Ritchie’s “Sherlock Holmes” devoted an entire film to the unconsummated love between Holmes and Watson.

He takes over movies during a crucial moment for Warner Bros. The “Harry Potter” gravy train ends this summer, and next year brings Nolan’s final “Batman” as well as the potential relaunching of “Superman.” Nolan’s film is a sure thing, but Snyder’s “Superman” has a lot of work to do to achieve the megahit status Warner Bros. wants. Meanwhile, Marvel properties should soak up lots of the attention next year, with “The Avengers” and “The Amazing Spider-Man” looking to be two of the biggest films on the schedule. It’s interesting to see how Robinov is choosing to bank on his company’s established, but often cinematically troubled, stable of characters. After all, if Marvel and its affiliated studios can make two “Hulk” movies, a “Daredevil” flick and two “Punisher” movies in a matter of years, why shouldn’t iconic characters like Wonder Woman and the Flash get their shot?

Share

Why foreign-born actors are getting the prime American comic book movie roles

Actors born or raised outside of the United States seem to be getting cast in seemingly every iconic American superhero role nowadays. Henry Cavill as Superman just joined Christian Bale’s Batman and Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man to make it a trifecta: three actors born or raised in the U.K. are suiting up as the three most iconic American superheroes in movies due out next year. And because this happened three times, it is immediately a trend and you will hear about it roughly 12,000 times over the next 22 months.

It’s even happening with lesser superheroes, as non-stateside actors are also netting those roles: Canadian Ryan Reynolds and Aussie Chris Hemsworth will play the Green Lantern and Thor this summer. So Vulture spoke to some agents and casting directors, and they said it’s because American actors aren’t “manly” enough.

While this sounds nice in theory, it’s pretty specious reasoning. For one thing, have you looked at Andrew Garfield? Nobody saw the guy in “The Social Network” and left the theater thing, “Man, that Andrew Garfield could certainly handle himself in a fight.” He looks like 83 percent of his body weight is in his hair. For another thing, the biggest actor in the world right now is Philadelphia native Will Smith. The guy (believably) played Muhammad Ali. I don’t think anyone is questioning his manliness; ditto Brad Pitt and George Clooney and Matt Damon (who I’m pretty sure learned on the “Bourne” set how to beat you to death with a rolled-up magazine, and not one of those special issues of Vanity Fair, I’m talking a Time-sized mag).

The first casting director quoted in the story specifically cites American actors in their 20s and 30s like Jesse Eisenberg. Okay, that’s a fair point. Many from the up-and-coming crop of young actors nowadays look pretty boyish; Eisenberg, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Garrett Hedlund (“Tron: Legacy”) and the amoebic Shia LaBeouf all look young. That’s because they are young. Not all young men look inherently manly, and not all guys look more manly or tough as they age; I speak from experience on this, because no matter how hard I try I’m probably never going to grow a mustache.

The first casting director quoted (who worked on “The Dark Knight” and is doing its sequel) does make an excellent point when he says that it’s not that American actors can’t act manly, it’s that manly-seeming kids in this country are often steered towards athletics and derided if they want to play football and act in the school play. That’s not the case in the U.K., he says. So if it’s a cultural thing that is causing manly young men like Cavill, Hemsworth, the late Heath Ledger and “Avatar” star Sam Worthington from other countries to give acting a go, that makes sense. But the States are still churning out the occasional young man with grit and hustling them into the pictures, like “Star Trek” star Chris Pine, Honolulu-born Jason Momoa (starring in the upcoming “Conan the Barbarian” remake, so he’s an odd addition to this list, but hey, it counts) and Chris Evans (the star of this summer’s “Captain America”). And other countries are still producing male actors who aren’t exactly paragons of manliness, like Garfield, Orlando Bloom, Daniel Radcliffe and Robert Pattinson. (Let me put it to you this way: If some of those four franchise stalwarts were put into a fight against young American would-be franchise anchors like Evans, Garrett Hedlund and Chris Pine, would you immediately take the Brits?)

I’d also note that complaints about this casting seem decidedly one-sided. Hugh Jackman, an Australian, has played the most famous Canadian superhero ever in four movies now. James Bond is currently played by a guy born in Cheshire, while the actor before him was Irish and the iconic first guy was Scottish. (Also, on a related note, you should watch this.) “The Adventures of Tintin” comics are huge in Europe, and less so here; but it’s an American director named Spielberg who is directing the first film. J.R.R. Tolkien was born in South Africa, and his epic Lord of the Rings books were set on Middle-Earth, yet why didn’t casting directors take the time to find Elvish actors to play those roles? Wait, hang on, I’m getting away from my point.

Oh, right: who cares? Did anybody out there think twice about seeing “The Dark Knight” because a Welshman and an Aussie were playing Batman and the Joker? Of course not, because it doesn’t matter where someone was born in order to pretend to fight crime dressed as a giant bat. Ditto Superman. It’s nice that Superman is an American creation, and that he fights/fought for Truth, Justice and the Amurrican Way (it remains to be seen if the line survives into the upcoming reboot). A guy born on the Channel Islands is just as capable of pretending he can fly and shoot laser beams out of his eyes as a guy who literally grew up in Kansas.

It could be that American icons like these have long been international properties, and the casting is just catching up to it. (After all, Christopher Nolan was born in London, “Thor” director Kenneth Branagh is terribly British and Martin Campbell, director of “Green Lantern,” was born in New Zealand.) It could be that audiences are increasingly drawn to representations of a globalized world, or some nonsense like that. Or it could be that the manly American stars like Will Smith and the like are too big and too expensive to make comic book movies, which is why comic book movies often cast young and cheap quantities. There’s also the fact that many comic book movie storylines require people who aren’t physically imposing (like Hulk, Iron Man and Spider-Man).

Or, and this is just a theory: It could just be a combination of factors like right time, right age, right place and right price. That seems the likeliest explanation. It’s not so much that these dang foreigners done took our jebs, nor that they are the dream guys for any of these roles (I mean, look at Jon Hamm’s chin, the guy was born to be Superman). These are the guys available when they were casting the movies. A lot of this is just a weird coincidence of timing, and it becomes even more obvious because all three characters (Spider-Man, Batman and Superman) have movies coming out next year (for the time being; the Superman movie could still get bumped to the following summer, which wouldn’t surprise me). Dressing it up as a trend because these are the three superhero icons of page and screen is interesting, but it’s not really indicative of any actual trend.

Share

“The Dark Knight Rises” villains will be Anne Hathaway as Catwoman and Tom Hardy as Bane

After what seems like eons of speculation, Anne Hathaway has been cast as one of the two female leads in “The Dark Knight Rises,” Warner Bros. announced today. She will play Selina Kyle, while already-announced bad guy Tom Hardy (“Inception”) will be playing Bane.

There are several things worth noting here, but let’s start with the biggest and most obvious: Hathaway’s character, Selina Kyle, is better known as Catwoman. If this were almost any other franchise, the announcement would be cut and dried — so-and-so is playing our villain, the end. But because it’s Christopher Nolan, and everything’s a goddamn puzzle, we have to note that the announcement did not specifically say she will be playing “Catwoman.” It says Selina Kyle, so it’s possible the movie deals with Catwoman’s origins or something, or it’s possible there’s another story-related element here.

And now, the Pfeiffer Family Christmas Card

Catwoman has a famously checkered history on the big screen. Michelle Pfeiffer’s turn in “Batman Returns” was successful, though she did have to pry that role out of Sean Young’s batty hands. In 2004, Halle Berry took on the character in a solo film, and the result is one of the most maligned and abhorred movies in modern cinema. (There was also Eartha Kitt’s portrayal on the old Adam West TV series.) So whether Hathaway starts the movie as the cat burglar (right? I think?) or transforms into it, it’s pretty solid casting in my opinion. She’s an Oscar nominee, fitting the mold for Nolan’s movies, and she’s also shown a willingness in recent years to take on very diverse and interesting roles. (She’s eight years younger than Christian Bale, if such things matter to you.) She’s talented and has made some good movies. And let’s face it: This could have been much, much worse.

The announcement of Tom Hardy as Bane doesn’t do a whole lot for me. Hardy’s fine, he’s a perfectly good talent and a good fit for the vibe of the series. It sounds decent, but what I recall of Bane was that he was this big hulking bruiser who snapped Batman’s spine at one point in the 1990s. I don’t really remember much beyond that. (He was presumably a great evil strategist or something, because he was a comic book villain.) So I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that Nolan is going to slightly reinvent the character and give him some, you know, interesting qualities. (In other words, don’t expect the mute brute from Joel Schumacher’s 1997 disaster, “Batman & Robin.”) I also don’t really think Nolan is going to close out his “Batman” trilogy with the Dark Knight’s spine shattered, so it’ll be interesting to see how Bane’s character is reconfigured as we learn about his eventual role in the film.

The final thing worth noting: The Internet exploded today with the news that Anne Hathaway was cast as Catwoman, but there’s another female lead waiting to be cast. Is it Talia Al Ghul? We’ll see, but the casting of that role could tell us more about this eventual story. Is Selina Kyle a villain in the movie, or is this other character? Which one is the love interest, or is it both? The movie opens July 2012, so you have another 18 months of speculation to enjoy.

(Also, Batman had some thoughts on this news.)

Share

“The Dark Knight Rises” circles some actresses for the two female leads

“The Dark Knight Rises” is inching closer to casting its female leads. According to some wildly differing reports yesterday, Christopher Nolan is either (A) screen testing actresses in the very near future for his third “Batman” movie or (B) has already cast them.

First, from the Hollywood Reporter‘s reliable Heat Vision blog: Over the next two weeks, Nolan is expected to test Keira Knightley, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Biel, Kate Mara and Charlotte Riley.

Knightley, Hathaway and Biel are all already pretty famous (and Hathaway was thisclose to being in Sam Raimi’s aborted “Spider-Man 4″). Mara has had some small roles in “Brokeback Mountain,” “Shooter,” “Iron Man 2″ and “127 Hours,” while her sister Rooney has the lead in “The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.” (Also, her family owns the New York Giants, so that might sway your opinion of her positively or negatively.) Riley is a wild card, as the British actress is mostly known for her turn in “Wuthering Heights” last year — where she acted opposite her fiancée, Tom Hardy, who has already signed on as one of the villains in “The Dark Knight Rises.”

Gemma Arteron (“Clash of the Titans,” “Prince of Persia”) is supposed to test, but was just cast in “Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters.” That might keep her out of this movie, because “Hansel and Gretel” starts filming in March and “Rises” starts shooting in May.

Remember, this movie has two female leads to fill, so it won’t be just one actress getting hired. Heat Vision also again reports that one of the two female leads is a villain and the other is a love interest. Interestingly, they say that one of the roles is Talia — as in Talia Al Ghul, who is the daughter of Ra’s Al Ghul (played by Liam Neeson in “Batman Begins”) and in the comic books was both a love interest and a villain.

So that’s from Heat Vision. We also have this report from Collider, which reports that the casting is already done, and claims to know both of the roles. They cite a source on this, and also note Nolan’s fetish for secrecy, so it’s entirely possible this is bogus. But: They are reporting that Eva Green and Naomi Watts have been cast, and they will be playing Talia Al Ghul and Vicky Vale, respectively. (Vale, remember, was the character played by Kim Basinger in Tim Burton’s first “Batman.”)

Collider does note the Heat Vision report and say it’s possible Green and Watts haven’t been cast, but they do stand by the inclusion of the Talia Al Ghul character in the film. As Heat Vision says, though, Watts can’t meet right now because she’s shooting a movie in Thailand (which would be done in time for her to make this movie, if she were cast), while Green has an Al Pacino movie filming beginning in April (which would mean she probably couldn’t make “Rises”).

The Collider report also has some information about a new Batmobile, costume and Batcave in the new film, though again, grain of salt, et cetera, et cetera.

WHEW. So. Who would be good? Honestly, any of these people. Who cares? Unless you have a knee-jerk aversion to one of them, it’s hard to argue that, you know, Biel or Hathaway or Mara or somebody would be an affront to the franchise (need I remind you that “Batman Begins” had Katie Holmes in it?).

I will say this: The biggest weaknesses of “Batman Begins” were Holmes and the third act structure. Both of those problems were fixed in “The Dark Knight,” particularly with Maggie Gyllenhaal. I know some folks aren’t a fan, for whatever reason, but it was very telling that Nolan went out and got a capital-A Actor for the movie’s love interest when he had the chance to recast it. He did much the same casting villains in his first and second movies. Holmes excepted, Nolan has a rather good eye for casting. Whether he goes with the established quantity of Hathaway or the less-known Riley, all that matters is that Christian Bale improves his Bat-voice this time around.

Anyway, we’re probably going to end up with Taylor Lautner cast in both roles, so it really doesn’t even matter.

PICTURED: None of these folks.

Share
nolanbatman1

Christopher Nolan confirms next “Batman” movie will be his last

Following on the heels of Christian Bale’s statement that “The Dark Knight Rises” will mark his final stint as Batman, Christopher Nolan confirmed he’s also approaching his third “Batman” film as his last turn with the franchise. He even sounds excited about it, mostly because nobody at Warner Bros. can tell him what to do: “I must say that I’m glad — I’m very, very glad — to be embarking on the last chapter of our Batman saga without any sense of obligation or duty to the studio. They did very well with ‘Inception.’ So I’m able to go into finishing our story in a very enthusiastic way,” he told EW.

Speaking of “Inception,” he says that he hasn’t given any thought to making a sequel (which is good), but that he is working on developing a videogame set in the movie’s world (that is also good, if you’re into videogames). He also says, for the umpteenth time, that he wants people to focus on the emotional meaning of the “Inception” ending, and maybe not so much asking him to say what happened.

Share

Completely predictable list of actresses considered for “The Dark Knight Rises”

Christopher Nolan’s third “Batman” movie is clearly going to be a big, mega-hyped topic, with every development breathlessly reported (certainly on this space, among many others). But this report, from Deadline, of the actresses being considered for roles in the movie…well, it seems like you could cut and paste the following list of names from literally any post about any movie currently being discussed by anyone, because it’s the same goddamn list you always hear:

Rachel Weisz, Naomi Watts, Blake Lively, Natalie Portman, Anne Hathaway and Keira Knightley.

I know, right? Where’s Amy Adams and Scarlett Johansson and seriously are there any women in Hollywood besides this one bunch? Really? I shouldn’t complain, because in all honesty A) some of these ladies are truly talented and worth seeing and B) they actually are of different ages and therefore it’s not all “Blake Lively v. ScarJo” here.

However, there IS an actual newsy tidbit in there: One of the female characters is the love interest, the other is a villain. Commence madcap speculation on which of these ladies would make the best Catwoman (Weisz, because why not).

Share

The next Batman will be called “The Dark Knight Rises”

Christopher Nolan has revealed the title of his third and final Batman movie: “The Dark Knight Rises.”

Speaking to the inimitable Geoff Boucher of the L.A. Times, Nolan revealed the title and also added that the film will not feature the Riddler, as has been rumored. The flick will also not be filmed in 3-D, sticking with the high-definition and IMAX cameras he used to such great effect in “The Dark Knight.” He did not name the film’s villain(s), only saying the movie would feature characters from the first two films as well as new ones. (He had already told Boucher that the film wouldn’t feature Mr. Freeze, either.)

Requisite information: Christopher Nolan’s “Batman Begins” came out in 2005, “The Dark Knight” was released in 2008 and now “The Dark Knight Rises” will come out in 2012. The movie has been referred to as “the new ‘Batman’ movie,” “Batman 3,” “Batman 7″ and any number of other things until now. So at least that’s done.

Separately, Moviehole is reporting that a bevy of young actresses (late 20s/early 30s) will be meeting with Nolan for the film’s female lead. Whether or not that’s Catwoman, as has been widely rumored, nobody has a goddamn clue.

Share

New “Batman” might film in April

And now, the first of what will probably be 12,000 posts documenting the progression of Christopher Nolan’s third “Batman” film: ComingSoon reports that the movie is filming in New Orleans starting in April. Besides the tax breaks, which just helped Warner Bros. out with “Green Lantern,” that’s a pretty random location. But then again, the last movie went to Hong Kong to film a few scenes, so who knows.

Share