Tagged: the hunger games

“Catching Fire” derby could be down to Lawrence and Miller

Nicole Sperling at the L.A. Times – who was, remember, the first person to name directors being considered for “Catching Fire” – reports that Lionsgate is down to two final candidates: Bennett Miller and Francis Lawrence. (Those names were first reported by the Playlist.) She reports that Lionsgate could offer one of them the job by the end of the week.

Interestingly, she mentions three other names that the studio considered for the job: Tomas Alfredson, Tony Scott and Stephen Daldry. Those names join the three contenders Sperling first reported last week:  Alfonso Cuaron, David Cronenberg and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu.

Now, these are all people that were considered for the job, which is not the same thing as those directors discussing or even expressing any interest in the job. The studio putting David Cronenberg or Stephen Daldry on a short list of potential directors doesn’t even mean those guys were directly contacted by Lionsgate (they likely contacted agents/representatives to gauge interest and see about availability, which is not the same thing as bringing David Cronenberg in to discuss the film). Still, it’s an interesting mix of names and it shows that Lionsgate was aiming fairly high for a guaranteed blockbuster with a compressed production schedule.

The fact that it’s come down to Miller and Lawrence isn’t surprising. As I said yesterday, those two names were both realistic, sensible choices for this job. Lawrence might have the edge due to scheduling: He’s available, whereas Miller’s drama “Foxcatcher” is scheduled to begin production in October. “Catching Fire” has to film this fall, so unless Miller can or will delay “Foxcatcher,” it looks like Lawrence might be the more likely pick.

Anyway, we’ll know the answer soon enough, so I guess I can stop speculating.

Share

Two new “Catching Fire” contenders: Bennett Miller and Francis Lawrence

Two new names have popped up as contenders to direct “Catching Fire,” the sequel to “The Hunger Games: Bennett Miller (“Moneyball,” “Capote”) and Francis Lawrence (“I Am Legend,” “Constantine” and, for some reason, “Water for Elephants”). Their names were first reported by the Playlist.

Both of their names make sense for different reasons. Miller’s success in taking over “Moneyball” showed he can skillfully jump into a project late in the game (I didn’t love it, but it was a Best Picture nominee and a good box office peformer), while Lawrence knows his way around action sequences. Both have drawbacks: Miller has directed dialogue-heavy movies, and we don’t know how he’d handle action (remember, the shaky-cam in “The Hunger Games” was terrible, and Gary Ross similarly had no experience directing action scenes); conversely, Lawrence can direct comprehensible action scenes, but we don’t really know how he’d handle the quieter, romance-oriented scenes. (I never saw “Water for Elephants,” so I can’t speak to his experience.)

One interesting aside: Miller took over “Moneyball” after that film fell apart at the last minute for Steven Soderbergh; Soderbergh went on to do a bit of second unit directing for “The Hunger Games.”

Miller and Lawrence join the trio of Alfonso Cuaron, David Cronenberg and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, three potential “Catching Fire” directors initially named last week by the L.A. Times. Those names seemed like long shots — particularly Cronenberg — whereas someone like Lawrence seems like a much more likely choice.

We should know relatively soon. Remember, “Catching Fire” comes out on Nov. 22, 2013. The film has to start production this fall (potentially August or September) in order to be finished before January, when the “X-Men: First Class” sequel is filming. (Jennifer Lawrence, who stars in “The Hunger Games,” signed her contract with Fox for “X-Men: First Class” before making deal for “The Hunger Games.” So Fox has first dibs on her time, basically.) It’s April, and the movie has no director and no finished script. I’m purely speculating here, but it seems like a director should be named sometime in the next couple of weeks.

Share

First names floated for “Catching Fire”: Cronenberg, Cuaron and Inarritu

Gary Ross is out as director of “Catching Fire,” which means that we have no choice but to breathlessly speculate about who Lionsgate will pick to direct the sequel to “The Hunger Games.” (We have NO CHOICE, okay?)

Nicole Sperling at the L.A. Times is the first to name the names of directors under consideration, and they are impressive: Alfonso Cuaron (“Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” “Children of Men”), David Cronenberg (“The Fly,” “A History of Violence”) and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (the excruciating “Babel,” “Biutiful”).

Sperling notes that the list of potential directors is “seven or eight names long, all men, and all have some significant credits to their name.” So while we have no idea what other names are on the list, we can immediately scratch off a few names based on what we know from here and elsewhere. No Sofia Coppola or Patty Jenkins, because the list is all male (which is unfortunate, because it is the sole major franchise with a female main character).

The names here suggest they aren’t looking to the very tip-top of the A-list for a director, which was already obvious given Lionsgate’s cost-conscious reputation, so there probably won’t be any courting of David Fincher or Christopher Nolan or any director of that ilk.

These names suggest they are looking for artier directors, which is actually very good news; not to belabor the point, but this isn’t Fox just handing off the third “X-Men” film to Brett Ratner. It reminds me of the time Summit reached out to Sofioa Coppola, Gus Van Sant and Bill Condon for the final “Twilight” movies (Condon wound up getting the job). I’m glad to see they are aiming so high.

[24 Frames]

Share

It’s Official: Gary Ross Won’t Direct “Catching Fire”

After much speculation about whether or not he would return for the sequel to “The Hunger Games,” director Gary Ross has confirmed that he won’t be making “Catching Fire.” Ross and Lionsgate announced the news with two statements issued on Tuesday night, with Ross blaming it on the tight timetable. Production has to begin this fall because series star Jennifer Lawrence has to shoot the “X-Men: First Class” sequel early next year, and the studio can’t/won’t delay “Catching Fire” because it’s scheduled for a November 2013 release date. Continue reading

Share

Weekend Box Office Roundup: “The Hunger Games” tops $300 million

WEEKEND OF APRIL 6-8

Two new films arrived for the holiday weekend, relying heavily on late-’90s nostalgia in an attempt to unseat “The Hunger Games” from the top of the box office charts. It didn’t work. The oddly enjoyable “American Reunion” performed admirably, coming in ably ahead of the exploitative “Titanic” (SAME MOVIE, HIGHER TICKET PRICES) rerelease. To the numbers! Continue reading

Share

Is “The Hunger Games” The First Best Picture Contender of 2012?

Nope. But thanks for asking.

(To expound: No, this movie will not be a Best Picture nominee. This movie won’t be on any of the short lists of potential nominees. This movie won’t even make most of the “OSCAR SNUBS!” lists after it is not nominated, save for a handful of lists written by big fans of the movie or people making the argument that big, popular blockbusters deserve consideration. Also, the movie is not “the best test yet” of the Best Picture category expanding from five to 10 films after “The Dark Knight” wasn’t nominated; “District 9,” “Up,” “Toy Story 3,” “The Blind Side” and “Inception” were all nominated thanks to the rule change. If you’re looking for a big blockbuster to proclaim as this year’s “The Dark Knight,” just have some patience until “The Dark Knight Rises” opens in July.)

Share

Weekend Box Office Roundup: “The Hunger Games” will be one of the biggest movies in box office history

After a mere 10 days at the box office, “The Hunger Games” isn’t just a hit. It’s a megahit, a gigantic blockbuster on track to become one of the 20 biggest movies in domestic box office history (without adjusting for inflation, of course). Let’s dive into the numbers because nothing shows a love and appreciation for the cinema like exploring box office results. Continue reading

Share

Weekend Box Office Roundup: “The Hunger Games” Tops $150 Million

“The Hunger Games” hasn’t been out for a full 72 hours, but the estimates are in and they are huge: The movie debuted with (an estimated) $155 million dollars, good enough to shatter several records.

(UPDATE: The actual opening wound up being $152.5 million, which still shattered said records.)

Continue reading

Share

Considering “The Hunger Games”

As you have probably heard, “The Hunger Games” arrives in theaters today. Here are six thoughts in advance of seeing the movie:

1.

I knew The Hunger Games as movies before I knew them as books, even though I read them before they started production on the movies. The only reason I wound up reading the books was because they were going to become movies. My personal backstory with Suzanne Collins’s series (which I only give to elucidate where I am coming from w/r/t this franchise) is: A friend who loves reading fiction and was going to be traveling a lot for work asked me for book recommendations. I mostly read nonfiction, so I recommended a few books, but he specifically wanted something big and action-packed to keep him entertained on airplanes. So I recommended the Hunger Games books, not because I had read them or knew much about them, but because the book Mockinjay had just arrived amid great hype — and, specifically, the kind of hype that said it was the new “Harry Potter”/”Twilight”-type Y.A. phenomenon was therefore going to be the next big series turned into a big movie franchise.

He read them (in a matter of days) and he loved them and gave them to my wife, who read them (in a matter of days; I think she finished the second book during a single day, and it wasn’t like she spent the entire day reading from sunrise to sunset or anything, it was a day where we went out into the world like people). And so my wife began the process of basically shaming me for recommending these books which temporarily possessed her and our friend’s minds and not even reading them myself, particularly because she knew I would formulate opinions on the movie before seeing it and yet I wouldn’t even take the small amount of time it would take to read then. So I read them — in a matter of days — and I loved them and I turned my attention to the task of being simultaneously jazzed for and apprehensive about the movie. Continue reading

Share